You did the work. The customer accepted it. They used the result, took the benefit, walked away with what they came for — and then refused to pay. Maybe there is a half-formed dispute pulled together after delivery. Maybe there is no reason at all and just a flat refusal. Either way, the position is the same: you have completed performance, and they have not.
Australian contract law and the Australian Consumer Law treat completed work that has been accepted and used as a closed circle. The customer’s obligation to pay is not extinguished by their late dissatisfaction, by their cash-flow situation, or by their willingness to test how far they can push you.
Why customers refuse to pay for completed work
Customers who refuse rather than delay have usually made a calculated bet. They have weighed the social, commercial and legal cost of paying you against the cost of you taking action. Where the unpaid amount is in the few-hundreds-to-low-thousands range, many customers gamble that you will not engage a lawyer, will not file a tribunal claim, and will eventually write the invoice off. A formal Letter of Demand is the cheapest signal that the bet was wrong.
The right legal step
A Letter of Demand identifies the engagement, the work performed, the acceptance evidence (sign-offs, use of the deliverable, follow-on requests), the invoice issued, the legal basis for the debt, and the specific tribunal or court that will be invoked next on a defined timeline. It is the single most cost-effective recovery action available in Australia.
What Claim Done delivers
- Engagement and acceptance history captured cleanly
- Pre-empts the most common late-stage refusal pretexts
- Statutory interest claimed where applicable
- 14-day deadline with named escalation forum
- Drafted and sent on professional legal letterhead for a flat $79
Common refusal pretexts and why they fail
- “It was not what we asked for.” Variations and acceptance are documented or they do not exist. Late-arriving complaints rarely defeat a properly drafted demand.
- “We never used it.” Use is documented through go-live, distribution, deployment, or downstream activity. Bare denial does not survive evidence.
- “There were defects.” Defects must be specific, particularised, and raised within a reasonable time — not invented at refusal time.
- “You can sue us.” Many customers who say this have not factored in tribunal filing fees being recoverable, public hearings, and the speed of the process.
Next escalation if the demand is ignored
For most amounts under the small claims tribunal cap in your state (NCAT, VCAT, QCAT and equivalents) the next step is a tribunal application — Claim Done drafts and lodges these for $79. For mid-size debts the Magistrates Court is the appropriate venue. For corporate customers and debts over $4,000, a Statutory Demand under section 459E of the Corporations Act 2001 is materially more powerful — 21 days to pay or face presumption of insolvency. A Final Demand ($79) is the short bridge between the Letter of Demand and any of these. Most refusing customers fold at the first or second step.